Hello,
I was just up looking at the new Bostock area for new books, and I must same I am very dissapointed by the lay out. The Old set up offered a sort of calming “privacy” by being so out in the open, amidst the general hubbub. Here it feels as if one is on stage in a mausoleum; for all the quiet, it is somehow a very disqueting experience. One does not feel invited to linger or explore.
ANother problem: The books do not appear to be sorted according to any easily discernible pattern that might aid the search. All the books are spine out (no frontal displays),and there are no labels directing the would be reader even to broad categories like “fiction” or “sports”. I am unsure if you track such things, but I imagine the rate at which new books are borrowed must be MUCH lower than previously. On the whole, an entirely lamentable state of affairs.
I STRONGLY suggest that, when Perkins is fully renovated, the New and Noteworthy be reconfigured according to its former lay out.
Thank You,
Kurt Wise
ANSWER PERSON RESPONDS: Thanks for your insightful recommendations. I’ll certainly pass them on to those who might have a say in the future layout. I agree that in the Carpenter Reading Room a user feels like all eyes move to him or her at the slightest rustle of a page, and this could inhibit browsing the N&N books. I’m guessing that some of the decision-makers are overly impressed with the quiet museum atmosphere in this space and welcome the “honor” they perceive it brings the books (especially the Duke Authors), so it’s important to hear from thoughtful dissenters like yourself.
In the old displays, the N&N were always spine out and the sections weren’t labeled. They were in call number order, as they are now. I suppose we could have a few broad markers such as “Literature and Language” at the beginning of the P’s, or “Social Sciences” at the beginning of the H’s (except for psychology, that is). This might be helpful, or it might not be practical. I believe the “frontal display” you’re thinking of was the former Duke Author display, where the books were facing outward. I agree that this is more eye-catching, but we probably only have room to do it with this small group, not all the N&N. I have no idea what the long-term plans are for N&N and Duke Authors once the totally reconfigured first floor of Perkins reopens late this summer.
I’m not sure what the circulation statistics are, but I would guess the third floor location (in a predominantly undergraduate reading room — certainly out of the way for faculty, staff, and most grad students), and the feeling that you’re bothering people who are studying, would negatively affect useage more than the arrangement of the N&N books on the shelf, which is the same as before.