{"id":5661,"date":"2010-07-30T11:00:42","date_gmt":"2010-07-30T15:00:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/library.duke.edu\/blogs\/scholcomm\/?p=5661"},"modified":"2011-03-23T13:14:52","modified_gmt":"2011-03-23T13:14:52","slug":"clearing-up-some-confusions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/30\/clearing-up-some-confusions\/","title":{"rendered":"Clearing up some confusions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The press of daily business yesterday made it harder than I expected to watch and listen to the entirety of the House <a href=\"http:\/\/oversight.house.gov\/\">Committee on Oversight and Governmental Reform&#8217;s<\/a> hearing on the Federal Research Public Access Act.\u00a0 Documents from the witnesses can be found <a href=\"http:\/\/republicans.oversight.house.gov\/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=922%3A07-29-2010-information-policy-qpublic-access-to-federally-funded-researchq&amp;catid=14&amp;Itemid=1\">here, on the page for the Committee&#8217;s Minority members<\/a>.\u00a0 Perhaps unfortunately, most of what I heard was from the panel of folks opposed to the legislation.\u00a0 From that group there were several pretty egregious comments about the state of scholarly research and publishing, and it seems like clearing up some of the misapprehensions might be worthwhile.\u00a0 There is lots to choose from, but I will focus on three seriously misguided claims.<\/p>\n<p>First, I was truly shocked to hear the official from the American Psychological Association let stand the assumption, made by a committee member, that part of the value added to a published article was the clearing of rights in any third-party owned material that is incorporated in that article.\u00a0 When the Congresswoman asked if that was part of the service that publishers provided, and opined that it was a significant contribution that would be a burden for individual authors, Mr. Beckler agreed with her and went on in general terms about all the value publishers add.\u00a0 Except, of course, publishers do not do this; authors do, and it <strong><em>is<\/em><\/strong> a burden.\u00a0 Indeed, virtually all scholarly publishers require that authors warrant, in their publication agreements, that they have received permission from any owners for incorporated content.\u00a0 This is as true of APA as it is of other publishers.\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.apa.org\/pubs\/authors\/publication-rights-form.pdf\">Here is the APA&#8217;s publication rights transfer document<\/a>; in the paragraph above the signature, item (b) is the author&#8217;s affirmation &#8220;that written permission has been obtained for all previously published and\/or copyrighted material contained in this manuscript.&#8221;\u00a0 So the claim that this is value added by publishers is, like so many such claims, really just free-riding on the labor of scholarly authors.<\/p>\n<p>A similar kind of claim was the one made by all of the panelists in this group that publishers add copyrightable content to the scholarly articles they publish.\u00a0 This was again in response to a question about editing and peer-review and it led all three to affirm that publishers make a contribution that is entitled to copyright protection independent of the copyright which they get from the authors via forced transfer.\u00a0 I have published several peer-reviewed and edited scholarly articles in my career, and every word of those articles was my own.\u00a0 Editors sometimes suggested changes (more often peer-reviewers did), but I created the protectable expression that incorporated those changes.\u00a0 Even copy editors usually obtain the author&#8217;s permission for changes beyond correcting a typo.\u00a0 I continue to be amazed and confused by the claim that there is some protectable contribution made by publishers, and I suspect that if there really were such a contribution it would be to the detriment of the scholarly record, since no publisher is as expert on the topic at hand, whatever it is, as the authors are.<\/p>\n<p>In this <a href=\"http:\/\/chronicle.com\/article\/Lawmakers-Hear-Arguments-for\/123719\/\">report from the Chronicle of Higher Education<\/a>, this claim about protectable contributions is  repeated in the form of AAP attorney Allen Adler&#8217;s assertion that  published articles are &#8220;partly the product of publisher&#8217;s labor.&#8221;\u00a0 There are two basic copyright principles that need to be asserted to understand why whatever work publishers put in on an article does not translate to copyright protection.\u00a0 First, copyright protects expression, not ideas.\u00a0 Whatever suggestions for revision come from publishers &#8212; and most of them come from independent, volunteer peer-reviewers &#8212; those suggestions do not translate into a copyright claim.\u00a0 Only expression, which is, or should be, the work of the authors, is entitled to copyright.\u00a0 Second, the Supreme Court has reminded us that no copyright can be earned simply for &#8220;sweat of the brow.&#8221;\u00a0 No amount of labor on an article earns a copyright interest unless it results in original expression, which the labor of publishers almost never does.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, there was the odd little speech given by one of the Committee members about how important it was that we do not allow foreign governments and companies to &#8220;steal our intellectual property.&#8221;\u00a0 When I heard this I want to shout that the Member did not understand the bill they were considering.\u00a0 FRPAA applies to published research which is already available for sale through various subscriptions and database.\u00a0 Foreign companies can already get their hands our &#8220;our&#8221; IP if they are willing to pay the prices for subscriptions or individual article downloads.\u00a0 Presumably Chinese companies, for example, that want to compete with the US are willing to pay the sky-high prices charged by STM publishers; it is the cost of doing business for them, and the publishers are happy to take their money.\u00a0 What FRPAA would remedy is the lack of access for smaller US companies and less wealthy educational institutions, as well as individual patients and others who need or are interested in the latest scientific research.\u00a0 Understood properly, FRPAA is not so much a threat to US competitiveness as it is a necessary step to maintain that competitiveness.\u00a0 As Sir Richard Roberts said in his remarks, if high school students, community colleges students, students at small colleges and researchers at smaller labs and companies can all get access to cutting edge scholarship, US research and development will accelerate.\u00a0 If they cannot, our economic future does not look good.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The press of daily business yesterday made it harder than I expected to watch and listen to the entirety of the House Committee on Oversight and Governmental Reform&#8217;s hearing on the Federal Research Public Access Act.\u00a0 Documents from the witnesses can be found here, on the page for the Committee&#8217;s Minority members.\u00a0 Perhaps unfortunately, most &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/30\/clearing-up-some-confusions\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Clearing up some confusions<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":122,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,26,36],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5661","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-authors-rights","category-copyright-issues-and-legislation","category-scholarly-publishing"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Clearing up some confusions - Scholarly Communications @ Duke<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/30\/clearing-up-some-confusions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Clearing up some confusions - Scholarly Communications @ Duke\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The press of daily business yesterday made it harder than I expected to watch and listen to the entirety of the House Committee on Oversight and Governmental Reform&#8217;s hearing on the Federal Research Public Access Act.\u00a0 Documents from the witnesses can be found here, on the page for the Committee&#8217;s Minority members.\u00a0 Perhaps unfortunately, most &hellip; Continue reading Clearing up some confusions &rarr;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/30\/clearing-up-some-confusions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Scholarly Communications @ Duke\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-30T15:00:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2011-03-23T13:14:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@klsmith4906\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@klsmith4906\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2010\\\/07\\\/30\\\/clearing-up-some-confusions\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2010\\\/07\\\/30\\\/clearing-up-some-confusions\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759\"},\"headline\":\"Clearing up some confusions\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-30T15:00:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-03-23T13:14:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2010\\\/07\\\/30\\\/clearing-up-some-confusions\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":913,\"commentCount\":0,\"articleSection\":[\"Authors' Rights\",\"Copyright Issues and Legislation\",\"Scholarly Publishing\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2010\\\/07\\\/30\\\/clearing-up-some-confusions\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2010\\\/07\\\/30\\\/clearing-up-some-confusions\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2010\\\/07\\\/30\\\/clearing-up-some-confusions\\\/\",\"name\":\"Clearing up some confusions - Scholarly Communications @ Duke\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-30T15:00:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-03-23T13:14:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2010\\\/07\\\/30\\\/clearing-up-some-confusions\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2010\\\/07\\\/30\\\/clearing-up-some-confusions\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2010\\\/07\\\/30\\\/clearing-up-some-confusions\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Clearing up some confusions\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/\",\"name\":\"Scholarly Communications @ Duke\",\"description\":\"Discussions about the changing world of scholarly communications and copyright\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759\",\"name\":\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/author\\\/ksmithl2duke-edu\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Clearing up some confusions - Scholarly Communications @ Duke","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/30\/clearing-up-some-confusions\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Clearing up some confusions - Scholarly Communications @ Duke","og_description":"The press of daily business yesterday made it harder than I expected to watch and listen to the entirety of the House Committee on Oversight and Governmental Reform&#8217;s hearing on the Federal Research Public Access Act.\u00a0 Documents from the witnesses can be found here, on the page for the Committee&#8217;s Minority members.\u00a0 Perhaps unfortunately, most &hellip; Continue reading Clearing up some confusions &rarr;","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/30\/clearing-up-some-confusions\/","og_site_name":"Scholarly Communications @ Duke","article_published_time":"2010-07-30T15:00:42+00:00","article_modified_time":"2011-03-23T13:14:52+00:00","author":"Kevin Smith, J.D.","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@klsmith4906","twitter_site":"@klsmith4906","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kevin Smith, J.D.","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/30\/clearing-up-some-confusions\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/30\/clearing-up-some-confusions\/"},"author":{"name":"Kevin Smith, J.D.","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#\/schema\/person\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759"},"headline":"Clearing up some confusions","datePublished":"2010-07-30T15:00:42+00:00","dateModified":"2011-03-23T13:14:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/30\/clearing-up-some-confusions\/"},"wordCount":913,"commentCount":0,"articleSection":["Authors' Rights","Copyright Issues and Legislation","Scholarly Publishing"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/30\/clearing-up-some-confusions\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/30\/clearing-up-some-confusions\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/30\/clearing-up-some-confusions\/","name":"Clearing up some confusions - Scholarly Communications @ Duke","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-30T15:00:42+00:00","dateModified":"2011-03-23T13:14:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#\/schema\/person\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/30\/clearing-up-some-confusions\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/30\/clearing-up-some-confusions\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/30\/clearing-up-some-confusions\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Clearing up some confusions"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/","name":"Scholarly Communications @ Duke","description":"Discussions about the changing world of scholarly communications and copyright","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#\/schema\/person\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759","name":"Kevin Smith, J.D.","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Kevin Smith, J.D."},"url":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/author\/ksmithl2duke-edu\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5661","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/122"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5661"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5661\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9800,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5661\/revisions\/9800"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5661"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5661"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5661"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}