{"id":5621,"date":"2010-07-27T13:27:09","date_gmt":"2010-07-27T17:27:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/library.duke.edu\/blogs\/scholcomm\/?p=5621"},"modified":"2011-03-23T13:14:52","modified_gmt":"2011-03-23T13:14:52","slug":"reading-the-fine-print","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/27\/reading-the-fine-print\/","title":{"rendered":"Reading the fine print"},"content":{"rendered":"

Yesterday’s announcement that the Library of Congress was designating new classes of works exempt from the anti-circumvention rules of the DMCA has generated lots of Internet buzz, especially about the exemption for those who “jailbreak” their cellular phones.\u00a0 The major exemption for higher education, allowing circumvention by faculty for a range of defined educational purposes, has also gotten some press, some of it excellent and some of dubious accuracy.\u00a0 In the latter category, unfortunately, is this piece from Inside Higher Education<\/a>, which I will discuss below.<\/p>\n

But first let’s look at the actual language of the exemption.\u00a0 What follows is based on the detailed description of the six exemptions given in today’s Federal Register<\/a>.<\/p>\n

First, the exemption is to permit circumvention of technological protection measures — the breaking of digital locks — for certain classes of works and for defined purposes.\u00a0 These rules do not change the definition of fair use; they merely specify a small group of purposes within the broader category of fair use for which circumvention is permitted.<\/p>\n

Next, this exemption applies to lawfully made and acquired DVDs that are protected by Content Scrambling System (CSS)<\/em>.\u00a0 This application is both broader and narrower than the previous rule.\u00a0 It does not require that the DVD be part of a university’s library collection, much less the collection of a film or media studies library.\u00a0 The DVD can come from anywhere as long as it is not pirated or stolen.\u00a0 But it applies only to DVDs that use CSS; it does not, for example, apply to Blu-Ray discs.\u00a0 So a faculty member can make a compilation of clips from her own DVD library, for example, unless she collects that library in some format other than traditional DVD.<\/p>\n

The exemption applies to three specific activities for which circumvention is necessary.<\/p>\n

First, it applies to educational uses by college and university faculty and by college and university students of film and media studies<\/em>.\u00a0 Notice that the category of faculty is all inclusive, but the category of students is limited.\u00a0 The Library of Congress determined that not all students needed this exemption; presumably they were also aware of industry fears that students would carry the permission too far if the exemption were general.\u00a0 Also, the application to educational uses does not include K-12 teachers, who were also determined not to need the ability to obtain high-quality clips.\u00a0 Presumably they are still expected to point a digital camera at a TV screen if they want a clip from a motion picture.<\/p>\n

The other activities to which the exemption applies are documentary film-making and non-commercial videos.\u00a0 Presumably some of the limitations to the persons allowed to circumvent for educational purposes may be mitigated by these two defined activities.\u00a0 A university student who is not studying film and media studies, for example, might still want to use a film clip in a class video project and could be permitted because it is a non-commercial video.<\/p>\n

So once we are clear about what can be used, by whom and for what purposes, it remains to ask what exactly we can now do.\u00a0 The answer is that we can circumvent technological protection measures in order to incorporate short portions of motion pictures into new works for the purpose of criticism and comment<\/em>. Several phrases here call for explication.\u00a0 First, circumvention is allowed for copying short portions, not entire films.\u00a0 Second, this exemption applies only to motion pictures, not to other content, like video games, that may be available on DVD.\u00a0 Third, the clip must be used to create a new work.\u00a0 I was glad to see that the explanation of this phrase in the Federal Register is explicit that “new work” does include a compilation of film clips for teaching, as well as other videos in which a short clip may be subjected to criticism and comment.\u00a0 Finally, that purpose of criticism and comment is a required aspect of the defined activity that is permitted.<\/p>\n

The last requirement for this exemption is a reasonable belief that circumvention is necessary to accomplish the permitted purpose<\/em>.\u00a0 The announcement is very clear that if another method of obtaining the clip without circumvention is available and will yield a satisfactory result it should be used.<\/p>\n

This seems like a lot of requirements, but I think that overall we have a pretty useful exemption here and one the application of which will not really be too difficult.\u00a0 Once we understand the four italicized phrases above, it seems that we should be able to recognize permitted instances of circumvention when we see them.\u00a0 Certainly this is easier to understand and apply than the exemption it replaced.\u00a0 But when we look back at that item from Inside Higher Ed, it is easy to see how excessive enthusiasm can still lead to misunderstanding.<\/p>\n

For one thing, the IHE piece does not acknowledge the limitation placed on students who can take advantage of this educational purpose exemption.\u00a0 It may be, as I suggest above, that that limitation will be swallowed by the other permissions, but we should at least recognize the intent behind the rule.\u00a0 More importantly, this exemption to the DMCA’s anti-circumvention rules really has nothing to do with the dispute between UCLA and AIME or with other projects to stream entire digital videos for teaching, in spite of what IHE suggests.\u00a0 While such projects may or may not be justifiable, this exemption does nothing at all to change or define the boundaries of fair use; it merely carves out a portion of those uses, which the Registrar calls “classic fair use,” for which circumvention is now permitted.\u00a0 There may be other uses that are fair, but this exemption neither determines that question nor authorizes circumvention for those purposes.<\/p>\n

It is what it is, and no more, but what it is is good news for higher education.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Yesterday’s announcement that the Library of Congress was designating new classes of works exempt from the anti-circumvention rules of the DMCA has generated lots of Internet buzz, especially about the exemption for those who “jailbreak” their cellular phones.\u00a0 The major exemption for higher education, allowing circumvention by faculty for a range of defined educational purposes, … Continue reading Reading the fine print<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":122,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24,28,37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5621","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-copyright-in-the-classroom","category-digital-rights-management","category-technologies"],"yoast_head":"\nReading the fine print - Scholarly Communications @ Duke<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/27\/reading-the-fine-print\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Reading the fine print - Scholarly Communications @ Duke\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Yesterday’s announcement that the Library of Congress was designating new classes of works exempt from the anti-circumvention rules of the DMCA has generated lots of Internet buzz, especially about the exemption for those who “jailbreak” their cellular phones.\u00a0 The major exemption for higher education, allowing circumvention by faculty for a range of defined educational purposes, … Continue reading Reading the fine print →\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/27\/reading-the-fine-print\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Scholarly Communications @ Duke\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-27T17:27:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2011-03-23T13:14:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@klsmith4906\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@klsmith4906\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2010\\\/07\\\/27\\\/reading-the-fine-print\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2010\\\/07\\\/27\\\/reading-the-fine-print\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759\"},\"headline\":\"Reading the fine print\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-27T17:27:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-03-23T13:14:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2010\\\/07\\\/27\\\/reading-the-fine-print\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":980,\"commentCount\":1,\"articleSection\":[\"Copyright in the Classroom\",\"Digital Rights Management\",\"Technologies\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2010\\\/07\\\/27\\\/reading-the-fine-print\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2010\\\/07\\\/27\\\/reading-the-fine-print\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2010\\\/07\\\/27\\\/reading-the-fine-print\\\/\",\"name\":\"Reading the fine print - Scholarly Communications @ Duke\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-27T17:27:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-03-23T13:14:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2010\\\/07\\\/27\\\/reading-the-fine-print\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2010\\\/07\\\/27\\\/reading-the-fine-print\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2010\\\/07\\\/27\\\/reading-the-fine-print\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Reading the fine print\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/\",\"name\":\"Scholarly Communications @ Duke\",\"description\":\"Discussions about the changing world of scholarly communications and copyright\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759\",\"name\":\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/author\\\/ksmithl2duke-edu\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Reading the fine print - Scholarly Communications @ Duke","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/27\/reading-the-fine-print\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Reading the fine print - Scholarly Communications @ Duke","og_description":"Yesterday’s announcement that the Library of Congress was designating new classes of works exempt from the anti-circumvention rules of the DMCA has generated lots of Internet buzz, especially about the exemption for those who “jailbreak” their cellular phones.\u00a0 The major exemption for higher education, allowing circumvention by faculty for a range of defined educational purposes, … Continue reading Reading the fine print →","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/27\/reading-the-fine-print\/","og_site_name":"Scholarly Communications @ Duke","article_published_time":"2010-07-27T17:27:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2011-03-23T13:14:52+00:00","author":"Kevin Smith, J.D.","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@klsmith4906","twitter_site":"@klsmith4906","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kevin Smith, J.D.","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/27\/reading-the-fine-print\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/27\/reading-the-fine-print\/"},"author":{"name":"Kevin Smith, J.D.","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#\/schema\/person\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759"},"headline":"Reading the fine print","datePublished":"2010-07-27T17:27:09+00:00","dateModified":"2011-03-23T13:14:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/27\/reading-the-fine-print\/"},"wordCount":980,"commentCount":1,"articleSection":["Copyright in the Classroom","Digital Rights Management","Technologies"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/27\/reading-the-fine-print\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/27\/reading-the-fine-print\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/27\/reading-the-fine-print\/","name":"Reading the fine print - Scholarly Communications @ Duke","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-27T17:27:09+00:00","dateModified":"2011-03-23T13:14:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#\/schema\/person\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/27\/reading-the-fine-print\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/27\/reading-the-fine-print\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2010\/07\/27\/reading-the-fine-print\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Reading the fine print"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/","name":"Scholarly Communications @ Duke","description":"Discussions about the changing world of scholarly communications and copyright","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#\/schema\/person\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759","name":"Kevin Smith, J.D.","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Kevin Smith, J.D."},"url":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/author\/ksmithl2duke-edu\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5621","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/122"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5621"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5621\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9801,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5621\/revisions\/9801"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5621"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}