{"id":1391,"date":"2009-05-27T12:08:08","date_gmt":"2009-05-27T16:08:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/library.duke.edu\/blogs\/scholcomm\/?p=1391"},"modified":"2011-03-23T18:32:45","modified_gmt":"2011-03-23T18:32:45","slug":"what-has-changed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2009\/05\/27\/what-has-changed\/","title":{"rendered":"What has changed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Courts in the U.S. have asserted for years that our copyright law is compatible with the First Amendment guarantee of free speech by citing to principles &#8212; fair use and the rule that copyright protects only expression and leaves the underlying ideas free for all to appropriate, reuse and build upon.\u00a0 Both of these safeguards are still in place, yet I have twice claimed in this space that we need to look again at the relationship between copyright and free expression.\u00a0 So the question presents itself, do I just not get it, as <a href=\"http:\/\/library.duke.edu\/blogs\/scholcomm\/2009\/03\/06\/a-call-to-action\/\">at least one commenter seems to think<\/a>, or has something changed to make reliance on fair use and idea\/expression inadequate these days?<\/p>\n<p>Although I am not convinced that the two principles usually cited were ever adequate, especially as the scope of copyright&#8217;s monopoly expanded, what has clearly changed, in recent years, is that Congress adopted the Digital Millennium Copyright Act in 1998.\u00a0 The DMCA added two provisions to the copyright act that have had a negative impact on free expression.<\/p>\n<p>First were the legal protections provided for technological protection measures, or DRM (digital rights management) systems.\u00a0 It is ironic that content owners decided to move toward technological locks because they felt that legal protections were inadequate, and then found they needed legal protection for those locks when they proved insecure.\u00a0 But the combination of digital locks and &#8220;anti-circumvention&#8221; rules has been devastating for free speech; even use of public domain works can now be locked up, and the law will prevent access.<\/p>\n<p>Lest we forget the power of DRM, here is a <a href=\"http:\/\/arstechnica.com\/tech-policy\/news\/2009\/05\/reminder-from-the-mpaa-drm-trumps-your-fair-use-rights.ars\">note about the Motion Picture Association of America &#8220;reminding&#8221; a court<\/a> that it is illegal to circumvent DRM systems even for a use of the material that would be perfectly legal.\u00a0 So when digital locks are used, one of the safeguards our courts have relied on to preserve free speech &#8212; fair use &#8212; is apparently useless.\u00a0 As the EFF attorney mentioned in a blog post linked above says, it is by no means certain that fair use is entirely trumped by DRM, but there is a case that held that, and the content owners certainly believe that fair use is now obsolete.<\/p>\n<p>An extensive study done by Patricia Akester, a researcher with the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law at Cambridge University, lends weight to that argument that what she calls &#8220;privileged uses&#8221; (like fair dealing in the UK and fair use in the US) are adversely impacted by DRM systems.\u00a0 There is a <a href=\"http:\/\/cyberlaw.stanford.edu\/node\/6184\">report of her study here<\/a>, and the full text (over 200 pages!) is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cam.ac.uk\/faculty-resources\/download\/technological-accommodation-of-conflicts-between-freedom-of-expression-and-drm-the-first-empirical-assessment\/6286\/pdf\">here<\/a>.\u00a0 Akester may have done the first empirical study of these adverse effects, and her conclusions are sufficiently gloomy to lead her to suggest a legislative solution.\u00a0 She proposes that a &#8220;DRM Deposit System&#8221; be established where content owners are required to deposit either the key to their lock or an unencrypted copy of the work.\u00a0 Then a user could make an argument or meet a set of requirements for access when their proposed use was clearly within a privilege.\u00a0 If the content owner declined to deposit with the system, circumvention for access for privilege uses would be allowed.\u00a0 Some such system, similar to the &#8220;reverse notice and takedown&#8221; proposal discussed here over a year ago, is clearly needed if fair use is to continue to function as a safeguard of free speech.<\/p>\n<p>The other provision of the DMCA that imperils free expression is the notice and takedown procedure itself, which was created to protect Internet service providers (ISPs) from liability for infringing activity that happened over their networks.\u00a0 In one sense, this &#8220;safe harbor&#8221; has been good for fair use, allowing the creation of user generated content sites like Flickr and YouTube where lots of fair use experimentation can take place.\u00a0 But that take down procedure is being abused, with bogus notices being sent to prevent legitimate and even socially necessary criticism and parody.\u00a0 ISPs are quick to takedown sites that are named in these takedown notices, and the process for getting them restored subjects the original poster to an increased risk of liability.\u00a0 It is very costly, after all, to defend free speech even against a bogus claim.\u00a0 So abusive takedown notices have now become a favored way to suppress criticism and comment that is unpopular with a major company or content owner.\u00a0 The long tradition of &#8220;I Hate BigCo, Inc., and here is why&#8221; web site, which courts have often held to be fair use of copyrighted and trademarked content, is now much riskier than it was before.\u00a0 In fact, the Electronic Frontier Foundation has even created these <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eff.org\/deeplinks\/2009\/05\/six-simple-steps-you\">six steps to safegaurd a gripe or parody site<\/a>, recognizing that free speech is not longer sufficiently protected by traditional provisions within the copyright law alone.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Courts in the U.S. have asserted for years that our copyright law is compatible with the First Amendment guarantee of free speech by citing to principles &#8212; fair use and the rule that copyright protects only expression and leaves the underlying ideas free for all to appropriate, reuse and build upon.\u00a0 Both of these safeguards &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2009\/05\/27\/what-has-changed\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">What has changed<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":122,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26,28,29,37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1391","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-copyright-issues-and-legislation","category-digital-rights-management","category-fair-use","category-technologies"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>What has changed - Scholarly Communications @ Duke<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2009\/05\/27\/what-has-changed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"What has changed - Scholarly Communications @ Duke\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Courts in the U.S. have asserted for years that our copyright law is compatible with the First Amendment guarantee of free speech by citing to principles &#8212; fair use and the rule that copyright protects only expression and leaves the underlying ideas free for all to appropriate, reuse and build upon.\u00a0 Both of these safeguards &hellip; Continue reading What has changed &rarr;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2009\/05\/27\/what-has-changed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Scholarly Communications @ Duke\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-27T16:08:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2011-03-23T18:32:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@klsmith4906\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@klsmith4906\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2009\\\/05\\\/27\\\/what-has-changed\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2009\\\/05\\\/27\\\/what-has-changed\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759\"},\"headline\":\"What has changed\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-27T16:08:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-03-23T18:32:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2009\\\/05\\\/27\\\/what-has-changed\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":805,\"commentCount\":1,\"articleSection\":[\"Copyright Issues and Legislation\",\"Digital Rights Management\",\"Fair Use\",\"Technologies\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2009\\\/05\\\/27\\\/what-has-changed\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2009\\\/05\\\/27\\\/what-has-changed\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2009\\\/05\\\/27\\\/what-has-changed\\\/\",\"name\":\"What has changed - Scholarly Communications @ Duke\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-27T16:08:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-03-23T18:32:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2009\\\/05\\\/27\\\/what-has-changed\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2009\\\/05\\\/27\\\/what-has-changed\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2009\\\/05\\\/27\\\/what-has-changed\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"What has changed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/\",\"name\":\"Scholarly Communications @ Duke\",\"description\":\"Discussions about the changing world of scholarly communications and copyright\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759\",\"name\":\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/author\\\/ksmithl2duke-edu\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"What has changed - Scholarly Communications @ Duke","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2009\/05\/27\/what-has-changed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"What has changed - Scholarly Communications @ Duke","og_description":"Courts in the U.S. have asserted for years that our copyright law is compatible with the First Amendment guarantee of free speech by citing to principles &#8212; fair use and the rule that copyright protects only expression and leaves the underlying ideas free for all to appropriate, reuse and build upon.\u00a0 Both of these safeguards &hellip; Continue reading What has changed &rarr;","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2009\/05\/27\/what-has-changed\/","og_site_name":"Scholarly Communications @ Duke","article_published_time":"2009-05-27T16:08:08+00:00","article_modified_time":"2011-03-23T18:32:45+00:00","author":"Kevin Smith, J.D.","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@klsmith4906","twitter_site":"@klsmith4906","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kevin Smith, J.D.","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2009\/05\/27\/what-has-changed\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2009\/05\/27\/what-has-changed\/"},"author":{"name":"Kevin Smith, J.D.","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#\/schema\/person\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759"},"headline":"What has changed","datePublished":"2009-05-27T16:08:08+00:00","dateModified":"2011-03-23T18:32:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2009\/05\/27\/what-has-changed\/"},"wordCount":805,"commentCount":1,"articleSection":["Copyright Issues and Legislation","Digital Rights Management","Fair Use","Technologies"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2009\/05\/27\/what-has-changed\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2009\/05\/27\/what-has-changed\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2009\/05\/27\/what-has-changed\/","name":"What has changed - Scholarly Communications @ Duke","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-27T16:08:08+00:00","dateModified":"2011-03-23T18:32:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#\/schema\/person\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2009\/05\/27\/what-has-changed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2009\/05\/27\/what-has-changed\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2009\/05\/27\/what-has-changed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"What has changed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/","name":"Scholarly Communications @ Duke","description":"Discussions about the changing world of scholarly communications and copyright","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#\/schema\/person\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759","name":"Kevin Smith, J.D.","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Kevin Smith, J.D."},"url":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/author\/ksmithl2duke-edu\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1391","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/122"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1391"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1391\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10191,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1391\/revisions\/10191"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1391"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1391"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1391"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}