{"id":12941,"date":"2014-11-03T08:22:59","date_gmt":"2014-11-03T13:22:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/?p=12941"},"modified":"2014-11-03T11:25:20","modified_gmt":"2014-11-03T16:25:20","slug":"fair-use-affirmative-defense","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2014\/11\/03\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\/","title":{"rendered":"Free speech, fair use, and affirmative defenses"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On an e-mail list to which I do not subscribe, there was recently a long exchange about fair use and large-scale digitization.\u00a0 Part of the exchange was forwarded to me by a friend seeking comment about a specific issue that was raised, but in the course of looking back at the thread I discovered this comment:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Fair use doesn&#8217;t &#8220;allow&#8221; large scale digitization and didn&#8217;t &#8220;allow&#8221; digitization in the case of HathiTrust. The fair use provision does not allow anything up front- it has to be won through litigation. The fair use provision was used as an affirmative defense in litigation concerning the HathiTrust et al., and after much time and money spent in litigation, the court ruled, and the appeals court ruled, that HathiTrusts&#8217;s activity could be considered fair.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This comment repeats a mistake that is very common in discussions of fair use &#8212; while noting correctly that fair use is an &#8220;affirmative defense,&#8221; it concludes from that fact that fair use must be something unusual, a privilege that we rely on rarely because it is risky and difficult to prove.\u00a0 But, as I hope to show with the rest of this post, affirmative defenses are quite common; in fact, almost all positive rights have to be treated as affirmative defenses in litigation.\u00a0 We rely on things that are &#8220;allowed&#8221; by affirmative defenses all the time.<\/p>\n<p>Basically, to call something an affirmative defense is to make a technical point about how it functions in a court case.\u00a0 We should not be frightened by the phrase or invest it with too much significance.\u00a0 Some of our most cherished rights would have to be called affirmative defenses in the technical sense that is the only proper usage of that phrase.<\/p>\n<p>Consider the case of <em>Cohen v. California <\/em>(1971), one of our most important cases about the meaning of the First Amendment.\u00a0 Mr. Cohen entered the Sacramento court house wearing a piece of clothing on which he had written a profane anti-war message &#8212; &#8220;F**K the Draft&#8221; &#8212; and was arrested for disturbing the peace because that message was considered &#8220;offensive conduct.&#8221;\u00a0 The Supreme Court ultimately held that it was protected speech, in spite of the profanity, and that Cohen&#8217;s arrest was therefore improper. But let&#8217;s imagine for a moment how the trial over this issue must proceed.\u00a0 The state would provide evidence that Cohen did wear the jacket, had deliberately painted the words on it, and knew what was written on his jacket when he entered the court house.\u00a0 Cohen&#8217;s defense would then be to actually admit all of those points, but raise an additional fact &#8212; his words were political speech protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.\u00a0 Free speech would thus function as an affirmative defense to vindicate Mr. Cohen&#8217;s right.<\/p>\n<p>I hope this example illustrates two things.\u00a0 First, all an affirmative defense means is that the defendant must raise additional facts or legal principles in addition to what the plaintiff or prosecution has asserted.\u00a0 This is not uncommon; anytime a defendant does more than simply deny the truth of everything the plaintiff says, they are raising an affirmative defense.\u00a0 Second, all of our most cherished rights in America can function as affirmative defenses in court, but that does not mean they are unusual or unreliable.<\/p>\n<p>In any court case, the plaintiff has to prove some facts in order to establish that a &#8220;cause of action&#8221; exists.\u00a0 A defendant then has two avenues &#8212; he can simply deny the truth of some or all of what the plaintiff has said (we call that arguing that the plaintiff failed to meet her &#8220;burden of proof&#8221;) or he can produce additional facts that show that what he is accused of doing is actually permissible (which is the defendant&#8217;s &#8220;burden of proof&#8221;).\u00a0 If we take the Georgia State copyright case as an example, we can see both strategies at work.\u00a0 For over 20 of the challenged excerpts, GSU successfully argued that the publishers had not met their burden of proof by showing that they owned a valid copyright in the works in question.\u00a0 Since the publishers could not produce valid transfers of copyright, there was no further need for a defense.\u00a0 For 40+ other excerpts, however, GSU successfully argued some additional facts and showed that their use was fair use (although the Appeals Court has now told the trial court to reanalyze this).\u00a0 Just like Mr. Cohen in the free speech case, GSU invoked a positive right that is precious to all Americans, but in the context of the lawsuit that right was presented as an affirmative defense.<\/p>\n<p>I can&#8217;t say it often enough &#8212; when one is sued for doing something one believes is actually allowed by the law, that &#8220;right,&#8221; whether it is free speech or fair use, is always presented in the form of an affirmative defense.\u00a0 All that means is that it is something which the defendant must raise to justify herself (something for which she bears the burden of proof), but these things are not rare, disreputable or frightening; they are the very rights that define our citizenship.<\/p>\n<p>Fair use is one such right, and the copyright law very clearly calls it a right (in section 108(f)(4) of Title 17).\u00a0 It is a key and indispensable component of our system of copyright, as the Supreme Court has reminded us many times (E.g., <em>Campbell v. Acuff Rose Music, Inc.<\/em>, 510 U.S. 569 (1994) at 575).\u00a0 It is, especially, a &#8220;safety valve&#8221; that protects free speech from encroachment by copyright holders, and it is useful to think of those two rights &#8212; free speech and fair use &#8212; together.<\/p>\n<p>So it is simply wrong to say that fair use does not &#8220;allow&#8221; anything because it is an affirmative defense, just as it would be wrong to say that about free speech.\u00a0 The First Amendment allows me to have campaign signs on my lawn during this election, even if my neighbors disagree strongly with me.\u00a0 It allows me carry a placard down a public sidewalk proclaiming that &#8220;The End is Near,&#8221; if I am so inclined.\u00a0 It would allow me even to wear a swastika tattoo, as offensive as that would be to many.\u00a0 In the same way, there are many activities that we can say with assurance are allowed by the right of fair use.\u00a0 When we use a quotation from a previous work in a new article we are writing, we do not stop to do a individualized analysis because we know, and pretty much everyone agrees, that this is a settled instance of fair use.\u00a0 Nor do we need to re-litigate the <em>Sony v. Universal Pictures<\/em> case every time we want to record a TV show to watch at a later time; the Supreme Court has confirmed for us that doing this is allowed by fair use.\u00a0 And in the HathiTrust case, the Second Circuit told us that fair use supports large-scale digitization for the purpose of indexing and access for persons with disabilities.\u00a0 It is possible that a rights holder could challenge such an activity again, just as some government entity could again try to outlaw profanity in political speech.\u00a0 Possible, but unwise and very unlikely.<\/p>\n<p>When we say something is an affirmative defense, all we are doing is indicating how it would be raised in litigation.\u00a0 Many of our most cherished freedoms would be raised as affirmative defenses.\u00a0 So we must resist the urge to allow ourselves to be frightened by that phrase or to accept arguments intended to make fair use seem odd, unusual, or risky.\u00a0 Fair use is no more unusual or dangerous than free speech is.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On an e-mail list to which I do not subscribe, there was recently a long exchange about fair use and large-scale digitization.\u00a0 Part of the exchange was forwarded to me by a friend seeking comment about a specific issue that was raised, but in the course of looking back at the thread I discovered this &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2014\/11\/03\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Free speech, fair use, and affirmative defenses<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":122,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26,29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12941","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-copyright-issues-and-legislation","category-fair-use"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Free speech, fair use, and affirmative defenses - Scholarly Communications @ Duke<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2014\/11\/03\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Free speech, fair use, and affirmative defenses - Scholarly Communications @ Duke\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On an e-mail list to which I do not subscribe, there was recently a long exchange about fair use and large-scale digitization.\u00a0 Part of the exchange was forwarded to me by a friend seeking comment about a specific issue that was raised, but in the course of looking back at the thread I discovered this &hellip; Continue reading Free speech, fair use, and affirmative defenses &rarr;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2014\/11\/03\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Scholarly Communications @ Duke\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-11-03T13:22:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-11-03T16:25:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@klsmith4906\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@klsmith4906\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/03\\\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/03\\\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759\"},\"headline\":\"Free speech, fair use, and affirmative defenses\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-11-03T13:22:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-11-03T16:25:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/03\\\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1288,\"commentCount\":2,\"articleSection\":[\"Copyright Issues and Legislation\",\"Fair Use\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/03\\\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/03\\\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/03\\\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free speech, fair use, and affirmative defenses - Scholarly Communications @ Duke\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2014-11-03T13:22:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-11-03T16:25:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/03\\\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/03\\\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/2014\\\/11\\\/03\\\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Free speech, fair use, and affirmative defenses\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/\",\"name\":\"Scholarly Communications @ Duke\",\"description\":\"Discussions about the changing world of scholarly communications and copyright\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759\",\"name\":\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kevin Smith, J.D.\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.library.duke.edu\\\/scholcomm\\\/author\\\/ksmithl2duke-edu\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Free speech, fair use, and affirmative defenses - Scholarly Communications @ Duke","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2014\/11\/03\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Free speech, fair use, and affirmative defenses - Scholarly Communications @ Duke","og_description":"On an e-mail list to which I do not subscribe, there was recently a long exchange about fair use and large-scale digitization.\u00a0 Part of the exchange was forwarded to me by a friend seeking comment about a specific issue that was raised, but in the course of looking back at the thread I discovered this &hellip; Continue reading Free speech, fair use, and affirmative defenses &rarr;","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2014\/11\/03\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\/","og_site_name":"Scholarly Communications @ Duke","article_published_time":"2014-11-03T13:22:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-11-03T16:25:20+00:00","author":"Kevin Smith, J.D.","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@klsmith4906","twitter_site":"@klsmith4906","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kevin Smith, J.D.","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2014\/11\/03\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2014\/11\/03\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\/"},"author":{"name":"Kevin Smith, J.D.","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#\/schema\/person\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759"},"headline":"Free speech, fair use, and affirmative defenses","datePublished":"2014-11-03T13:22:59+00:00","dateModified":"2014-11-03T16:25:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2014\/11\/03\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\/"},"wordCount":1288,"commentCount":2,"articleSection":["Copyright Issues and Legislation","Fair Use"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2014\/11\/03\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2014\/11\/03\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2014\/11\/03\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\/","name":"Free speech, fair use, and affirmative defenses - Scholarly Communications @ Duke","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#website"},"datePublished":"2014-11-03T13:22:59+00:00","dateModified":"2014-11-03T16:25:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#\/schema\/person\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2014\/11\/03\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2014\/11\/03\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/2014\/11\/03\/fair-use-affirmative-defense\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Free speech, fair use, and affirmative defenses"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/","name":"Scholarly Communications @ Duke","description":"Discussions about the changing world of scholarly communications and copyright","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/#\/schema\/person\/efc9b8deb1a1e82626f11fd55a3ea759","name":"Kevin Smith, J.D.","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e621549dfd2ef4eccb0dfbe0c710482c7829676bf7bbe97134fd95e1d5ebd8e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Kevin Smith, J.D."},"url":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/author\/ksmithl2duke-edu\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12941","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/122"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12941"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12941\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12954,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12941\/revisions\/12954"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12941"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12941"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.library.duke.edu\/scholcomm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12941"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}