Exams? Graduation? Already?

Yes, it is here; exams and graduation. It can be a time of stress, a time to recognize your hard work, even a time of celebration. But first, take a moment for diversion.

On Exams

Feeling stressed?
Learn how to deal with stressful exams through vintage advertising such as this ad for Lifebuoy soap: Whew! This Exam Is A Tough One! At least you won’t lose any dates if you follow their directions.

Ad for Lifebuoy soap

Tough questions?cover of teacher exam
Could you pass this 1892 teacher’s examination found in our Broadsides collection? Answers to the math questions have already been filled in. But alas, they didn’t show their work. Shouldn’t that lead to partial credit?

Who had an exam?
We even hear from Thomas Long about “Jesus’ Final Exam.” Can’t anyone get a break from exams? Long’s sermon begins at 32 minutes into the audio recording of this 1986 worship service from the Duke Chapel recordings collection.

Commencement

Once you’ve passed all of your exams, thoughts turn to time-honored traditions of graduation.

52 years ago at Duke
four-page issue of The Duke Chronicle notes what the Duke community could expect during the four days of commencement activities in June, 1962. But when you still have exams and papers due, graduation can still seem so far away.

Cover of Duke Chronicle 1962 commencement issue

Drama at commencement?
This commencement program from June, 1905 for the Memminger High and Normal School Academy of Music highlights not only a valedictory speech, but also the presentation of two essays, five musical performances, and two dramatic plays. Now, what drama would exemplify your academic experience?

Ahhh…

Once you work is done, whether you are graduating or simply completing another year of rigorous study at Duke, it’s time to unwind.

Taking to the streets
This photo from the William Gedney collection shows people celebrating in the streets of Benares, India. Gedney had just told them that you would ace your exams this year and so they started partying. Now that you know how they’ve celebrated your success, how do you plan to celebrate?

Image of people celebrating in the streets of Benares, India

Definitely time for cake
Will this vintage Pillsbury commercial from our AdViews collection tempt you into including their Deluxe Chocolate Cake in your party plans? Or, will you resist the cake and simply use the commercial as inspiration for your wardrobe choices for your end-of-year soirées?

May all of your papers, projects and exams go well. Good luck and best wishes from Duke University Libraries.

Using Google Spreadsheets with Timelines

Doris Duke timeline
Doris Duke timeline

We’ve been making use of the fabulous Timeline.js library for a while now. The first timeline we published, compiled by Mary Samouelian about the life of Doris Duke, uses Timeline.js to display text and images in an elegant interactive format. Back then the library was called Verite Timeline and our implementation involved parsing XML files using Python to render out the content on the page. And in general, this approach worked great. However, managing and updating the XML files isn’t all that easy. Things also get complicated when more than one person wants to work on them — especially at the same time.

Enter Google Spreadsheets! Timeline.js is now designed to easily grab data from a publicly-published Google spreadsheet and create great looking output out of the box. Managing the timeline data in the spreadsheet is a huge step up from XML files in terms of ease of use for our researchers and for maintainability. And it helps that librarians love spreadsheets. If someone errantly enters some bad data, it’s simple to undo that particular edit as all changes are tracked by default. If a researcher wants to add a new timeline event, they can easily go into the spreadsheet and enter a new row. Changes are reflected on the live page almost immediately.

Spreadsheet data

Timeline.js provides a very helpful template for getting started with entering your data. They require that you include certain key columns and that the columns be named following their data schema. You are free to add additional columns, however, and we’ve played around with doing so in order to include categorical descriptions and the like.

Here is a sample of some data from our Doris Duke timeline.

Data for Doris Duke Timeline
Data for Doris Duke Timeline

For entries with more than one image, we don’t include a ‘Start Date’ which means Timeline.js will skip over them. We then render these out as smaller thumbnails on our timeline page.

Images on Doris Duke timeline page
Images on Doris Duke timeline page

Going all-in with spreadsheets

We’ve published our subsequent timelines using a combination of the Google spreadsheet data to generate the Timeline.js output while also using the XML files to load in and display relational data (using the EAC-CPF standard) while using Python to generate the pages. However, for our latest timeline on the J. Walter Thompson Company (preview the dev version), we’ve decided to house all of the data (including the CPF relations) in a Google Spreadsheet and use PHP to parse everything. This approach will mean that we no longer need to rely on the XML files, so our researchers can quickly make updates to the timeline pages. We can easily convert the spreadsheet data back into an XML file if the need arises.

J. Walter Thompson Company Timeline
J. Walter Thompson Company Timeline

Code snippets

Note: there’s an updated syntax for newly created spreadsheets.

We’re taking advantage of the Google spreadsheet data API that allows for the data to easily be parsed as JSON. Querying the spreadsheet in PHP looks something like this:

$theURL = "http://spreadsheets.google.com/feeds/list/[your-spreadsheet-key]/
od6/public/values?alt=json&callback=displayContent";

$theJSON = file_get_contents($theURL, 0, $ctx); //the $ctx variable sets a timeout limit

$theData = json_decode($theJSON, TRUE);

And then we can loop through and parse out the data using something like this:

foreach ($theData['feed']['entry'] as $item) {

	echo $item['gsx$startdate']['$t'];
	// Note that the column names in the spreadsheet are targeted by adding 'gsx$' 
	   and 'the column name in lc with no spaces'
	   You may also want to use 'strtotime' on the dates so that you can 
	   transform them using 'date'

	echo $item['gsx$enddate']['$t'];

	echo $item['gsx$headline']['$t'];

	echo $item['gsx$text']['$t'];

	... // and so on
}

One important thing to note is that by default, the above query structure only gets data from the primary worksheet in the spreadsheet (which is targeted using the od6 variable). Should you want to target other worksheets, you’ll need to know which ‘od’ variable to use in your query. You can view the full structure of your spreadsheet by using a url like this:

https://spreadsheets.google.com/feeds/worksheets/[your-spreadsheet-key]/public/basic

Then match up the ‘od’ instance to the correct content and query it.

Timelines and Drupal

We’ve also decided to integrate the publishing of timelines into our Drupal CMS, which drives the Duke University Libraries website, by developing a custom module. Implementing the backend code as a module will make it easy to apply custom templates in the future so that we can change the look and feel of a timeline for a given context. The module isn’t quite finished yet, but it should be ready in the next week or two. All in all, this new process will allow timelines to be created, published, and updated quickly and easily.


UPDATE

I recently learned that sometime in early 2014, google changed the syntax for published spreadsheet URLs and they are no longer using spreadsheet key as an identifier. As such, the syntax for retrieving a JSON feed has changed.

The new syntax looks like this:

https://spreadsheets.google.com/feeds/cells/[spreadsheet-ID]/[spreadsheet-index]/public/basic?alt=json&callback=displayContent

‘spreadsheet-ID’ is the string of text that shows up when you publish your spreadsheet:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/[spreadsheet-ID]/pubhtml

‘spreadsheet-index’ you can see when editing your spreadsheet – it’s the value that is assigned to ‘gid’ or in the case below, it’s ‘0’:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/[spreadsheet-ID]/edit#gid=0

I hope this helps save some frustration of finding documentation on the new syntax.

Post contributed by Michael Daul

Digitization Details: Bringing Duke Living History Into Your Future

Recently, I digitized 123 videotapes from the Duke University Living History Program. Beginning in the early 1970’s, Duke University faculty members conducted interviews with prominent world leaders, politicians and activists. The first interviews were videotaped in Perkins Library at a time when video was groundbreaking technology, almost a decade before consumer-grade VCRs starting showing up in people’s living rooms. Some of the interviews begin with a visionary introduction by Jay Rutherfurd, who championed the program:

“At the W. R. Perkins library, in Duke University, we now commit this exciting experiment in electronic journalism into your future. May it illuminate well, educate wisely, and relate meaningfully, for future generations.”

Clearly, the “future” that Mr. Rutherfurd envisioned has arrived. Thanks to modern technology, we can now create digital surrogates of these videotaped interviews for long-term preservation and access. The subjects featured in this collection span a variety of generations, nationalities, occupations and political leanings. Interviewees include Les Aspin, Ellsworth Bunker, Dr. Samuel DuBois Cook, Joseph Banks Rhine, Jesse Jackson, Robert McNamara, Dean Rusk, King Mihai of Romania, Terry Sanford, Judy Woodruff, Angier Biddle Duke and many more. The collection also includes videotapes of speeches given on the Duke campus by Ronald Reagan, Abbie Hoffman, Bob Dole, Julian Bond and Elie Wiesel.

residue
Residue wiped off the head of a U-matic playback deck, the result of sticky-shed syndrome.

Many of the interviews were recorded on 3/4″ videotape, also called “U-matic.” Invented by Sony in 1969, the U-matic format was the first videotape to be housed inside a plastic cassette for portability, and would soon replace film as the primary television news-gathering format. Unfortunately, most U-matic tapes have not aged well. After decades in storage, many of the videotapes in our collection now have sticky-shed syndrome, a condition in which the oxide that holds the visual content is literally flaking off the polyester tape base, and is gummy in texture. When a videotape has sticky-shed, not only will it not play correctly, the residue can also clog up the tape heads in the U-matic playback deck, then transfer the contaminant to other tapes played afterwards in the same deck. A U-matic videotape player in good working order is now an obsolete collector’s item, and our tapes are fragile, so we came up with a solution: throw those tapes in the oven!

oven2
After baking, the cookies (I mean U-matic videotapes) are ready for digitization!

At first that may sound reckless, but baking audio and videotapes at relatively low temperatures for an extended period of time is a well-tested method for minimizing the effects of sticky-shed syndrome. The Digital Production Center recently acquired a scientific oven, and after initial testing, we baked each Duke Living History U-matic videotape at 52 celsius (125 fahrenheit) for about 10 hours. Baking the videotapes temporarily removed the moisture that had accumulated in the binder, and made them playable for digitization. About 90% of our U-matic tapes played well after baking. Many of them were unplayable beforehand.

videoracks
The Digital Production Center’s video rack and routing system.

After giving the videotapes time to cool down, we digitize each tape, in real time, as an uncompressed  file (.mov) for long-term preservation. Afterwards, we make a smaller, compressed version (.mp4) of the same recording, which is our access copy. Our U-matic decks are housed in an efficiently-designed rack system, which also includes other obsolete videotape formats like VHS, Betacam and Hi8. Centralized audio and video routers allow us to quickly switch between formats while ensuring a clean, balanced and accurate conversion from analog to digital. Combining the art of analog tape baking with modern video digitization, the Digital Production Center is able to rescue the content from the videotapes, before the magnetic tape ages and degrades any further. While the U-matic tapes are nearing the end of their life-span, the digital surrogates will potentially last for centuries to come. We are able to benefit from Mr. Rutherfurd’s exciting experiment into our future, and carry it forward… into your future. May it illuminate well, educate wisely, and relate meaningfully, for future generations.

 

Post contributed by Alex Marsh

 

Society of North Carolina Archivists Annual Meeting Slides

On Tuesday April 8, I had the honor of presenting at the annual meeting of the Society of North Carolina Archivists with representatives from Wake Forest University and Davidson College. The focus of our panel was to present alternatives to CONTENTdm, a system for displaying digital collections widely used by libraries. At Duke, we have developed our own Tripod interface to digital collections. Wake Forest and Davidson use a variety of tools most notably DSpace and Islandora (via Lyrasis) respectively. It was great to present with and learn more about the Wake Forest and Davidson programs! I’ve embedded slides from all three speakers below.





A New Dimension for Duke’s Digital Collections

As our long-term readers of Bitstreams will attest, the Duke Digital Collections program has an established and well-earned reputation as a trailblazer when it comes to introducing new technologies, improved user interfaces, high definition imaging, and other features that deliver digital images with a beauty and verisimilitude true to the originals held by the David M. Rubenstein Rare Book & Manuscript Library.  Thus, we are particularly proud to launch today our newest feature, Smell-O-Bit, which adds a whole new dimension to the digital collections experience.

Smell-O-Bit is a cutting-edge technology that utilizes the diffusers built into most recent model computers to emit predefined scents associated with select digital objects within the Duke Digital Collections site.  While still in a test phase, the Digital Collections team has already tagged several images with scents that evoke the mood or content of key images.   To experience the smells, simply select Ctl-Alt-W-Up- while viewing these test images:

 

A bold scent for a bold product, Pabst-ett cheese!

Made by the Pabst brewing company while beer was off limits due to Prohibition, Pabst-ett cheese was soft, spreadable, and comfort-food delicious.  We’ve selected a bold, tangy scent to highlight these comforts.  The scent may make you happy enough to slap your own cheeks!

The smell of late a night chess match.

The smell of cigarette smoke, margaritas, and salt from around glass rims and chess players’ brows will make you feel as if you have front row seating at this chess match between composer John Cage and a worthy, but anonymous opponent.

A scent strong enough to eat!

You may feel yourself  overwhelmed with the wafting scent of char-broiled deliciousness, but don’t forget to take a deep inhale to detect the pickles, ketchup, and mustard which makes this a savory image all around.

Perhaps you smell garbage? If so, your Garbex isn’t working!  What about flies, cats, or dogs? Or, perhaps you just smell a rat. Alright, you caught us.

Happy April Fool’s Day from Duke Digital Collections!!

Post Contributed by Duke Digital Collections

 

Schema.org and Google for Local Discovery: Some Key Takeaways

Google CSE & schema.orgOver the past year and a half, among our many other projects, we have been experimenting with a creative new approach to powering searches within digital collections and finding aids using Google’s index of our structured data. My colleague Will Sexton and I have presented this idea in numerous venues, most recently and thoroughly for a recorded ASERL (Association of Southeastern Research Libraries) webinar on June 6, 2013.

We’re eager to share what we’ve learned to date and hope this new blog will make a good outlet. We’ve had some success, but have also encountered some considerable pitfalls along the way.

What We Set Out to Do

I won’t recap all the fine details of the project here, but in a nutshell, here are the problems we’ve been attempting to address:

  • Maintaining our own Solr index takes a ton of time to do right. We don’t have a ton of time.
  • Staff have noted poor relevance rank and poor support for search using non-Roman characters.
  • Our digital collections search box is actually used sparsely (in only 12% of visits).
  • External discovery (e.g., via Google) is of equal or greater importance vs. our local search for these “inside-out” resources.

Here’s our three-step strategy:

  1. Embed schema.org data in our HTML (using RDFa Lite)
  2. Get Google to index all of our embedded structured data
  3. Use Google’s index of our structured data to power our local search for finding aids & digital collections

Where We Are Today

We mapped several of our metadata fields to schema.org terms, then embedded that schema.org data in all 74,000 digital object pages and all 2,100 finding aids. We’re now using Google’s index of that data to power our default search for:

  1. All of our finding aids (a.k.a. collection guides).  [Example search for “photo”]
  2. One digital collection: Sidney Gamble Photographs. [Example search for “beijing”]

Though the strategy is the same, some of the implementation details are different between our finding aids and digital collections applications. Here are the main differences:

Site Service Google CSE API Max Results per Query
Finding Aids Google Custom Search (free) JS v1.0 100
Digital Collection Google Site Search
(premium version of Custom Search)
XML API 1,000

 

Finding Aids Search

Embedding the Data. We kept it super simple here. We labeled every finding aid page a ‘CollectionPage’ and tagged only a few properties: name, description, creator, and if present, a thumbnailUrl for a collection with digitized content.

Schema.org tags using RDFa Lite in finding aid HTML
Schema.org tags using RDFa Lite in finding aid HTML

Rendering Search Results Using Google’s Index. 

This worked great. We used a Google Custom Search Element (CSE) and created our own “rich snippets” using the CSE JavaScript API (v1.0) and the handy templating options Google provides. You can simply “View Source” to see the underlying code: it’s all there in the HTML. The HTML5 data- attributes set all the content and the display logic.

Google Javascript objects used in search result snippet presentation.
Google Javascript objects used in search result snippet presentation.

 

Digital Collections Search: Sidney D. Gamble Collection

Embedding the Data.

Our digital collections introduce more complexity in the structured data than we see in our finding aids. Naturally, we have a wide range of item types with diverse metadata. We want our markup to represent the relationship of an item to its source collection. The item, the webpage that it’s on, the collection it came from, and the media files associated with it all have properties that can be expressed using schema.org terms. So, we tried it all.[1]

Example Schema.org tags used in item pages
Example Schema.org tags used in item pages

Rendering Search Results Using Google’s Index. 

For the Gamble collection, we succeeded in making queries hit Google’s XML API while sustaining the look of our existing search results. Note that the facets in the left side aren’t powered via Google–we haven’t gotten far enough in our experiment to work with filtering the result set based on the structured data, but that’s possible to do.

Search result rendering using Google's XML API
Search result rendering using Google’s XML API

Outcomes 

 

The Good

We’ve been pleased with the ability to make our own rich snippets and highly customize the appearance of search results without having to do a ton of development. Getting our structured data back from Google’s index to work with is an awesome service and developing around the schema.org properties that we were already providing has been a nice way to kill two birds with one stone.

For performance, Google CSE is working well in both the finding aids and the Gamble digital collection search for these purposes:

  • getting the most relevant content presented early on in the search result
  • getting results quickly
  • handling non-Roman characters in search terms
  • retrieving a needle in a haystack — an item or handful of items that contain some unique text

The Gotchas

While Google CSE  shows relevant results quickly, we’re finding it’s not a good fit for exploratory searching when either of these aspects is important:

  • getting a stable and precise count of relevant results
  • browsing an exhaustive list of results that match a general query

Be careful: queries max out at 100 results with the JavaScript APIs or 1,000 results when using the XML API.  Those limits aren’t obvious in the documentation, yet they might be a deal-breaker for some potential uses.

For queries with several pages of hits, you may get an estimated result count that’s close, but unfortunately things occasionally and inexplicably go sour as you navigate from from one result page to the next.  E.g., the Gamble digital collection query ‘beijing‘ shows about 2,100 results (which is in the ballpark of what Solr returns), yet browse a few pages in and the result set will get truncated severely: you may only be able to actually browse about 200 of the results without issuing more specific query terms.

Other Considerations

Impact on External Discovery

Traffic to digital collections via external search engines has mostly climbed steadily every quarter for the past few years, from 26% of all visits in Jul-Sep 2011 up to 44% from Jan-Mar 2014 (to date) [2]. We entered schema.org tags in Oct 2012, however we don’t know whether adding that data has contributed at all to this trend. Does schema.org data impact relevance? It’s hard to tell.

Structured Data Syntax + Google APIs

Though RDFa Lite and microdata should be equally acceptable ways to add schema.org tags, Google’s APIs actually work better with microdata if there are nested item types.[3]  And regardless of microdata or RDFa, the Google CSE JavaScript API unfortunately can’t access more than one value for any given property, so that can be problematic [4].

Rich Snippets in Big Google

We’re seeing Google render rich snippets for our videos, because we’ve marked them as schema.org VideoObjects with properties like thumbnailUrl. That’s encouraging! Perhaps someday Google will render better snippets for things like photographs (of which we have a bunch), or maybe even more library domain-specific materials like digitized oral histories, manuscripts, and newspapers.  But at present, none of our other objects seem to trigger nice snippets like this.

A rich snippet triggered by using schema.org videoObject type & thumbnailUrl property.
A rich snippet triggered by using schema.org videoObject type & thumbnailUrl property.

Footnotes

[1] We represented item pages as schema.org “ItemPage” types using the “ispartOf” property to relate the item page to its corresponding “CollectionPage”. We made the ItemPage “about” a “CreativeWork”. Then we created mappings for many of our metadata fields to CreativeWork properties, e.g., creator, contentLocation, genre, dateCreated.

[2] Digital Collections External Search Traffic by Quarter

Quarter    Visits via Search   % Visits via Search

Jul – Sep 2011   26,621   25.97%
Oct – Dec 2011   32,191   29.59%
Jan – Mar 2012   41,048   32.16%
Apr – Jun 2012   33,872   34.49%
Jul – Sep 2012   28,250   32.40%
Oct – Dec 2012   38,472   36.52% <– entered schema.org tags Oct 19, 2012
Jan – Mar 2013   39,948   35.29%
Apr – Jun 2013   36,641   38.30%
Jul – Sep 2013   35,058   41.88%
Oct – Dec 2013   46,082   43.98%
Jan – Mar 2014   47,123   43.93%

[3] For example, if your RDFa indicates that “an ItemPage is about a CreativeWork whose creator is Sidney Gamble”– the creator of the creative work is not accessible to the API since the CreativeWork is not a top-level item.  To get around that, we had to duplicate all the CreativeWork properties in the HTML <head>, which is unnatural and a bit of a hack.

[4]  Google’s CSE JS APIs also don’t let us retrieve the data when there are multiple values specified for the same field. For a given CreativeWork, we might have six locations that are all important to represent: China; Beijing (China); Huabei xie he nu zi da xue (Beijing, China); 中国; 北京;  华北协和女子大学.  The JSON returned by the API only contains the first value: ‘China’. This, plus the result count limit, made the XML API our only viable choice for digital collections.

Digitization Details: Sidney D. Gamble’s Lantern Slides

I have worked in the Digital Production Center since March of 2005 and I’ve seen a lot of digital collections published in my time here.  I have seen so many images that sometimes it is difficult to say which collection is my favorite but the Sidney D. Gamble Photographs have always been near the top.

The Sidney D. Gamble Photographs are an amazing collection of black and white photographs of daily life in China taken between 1908 and 1932.  These documentary style images of urban and rural life, public events, architecture, religious statuary, and the countryside really resonate with me for their unopposed moment in time feel.  Recently the Digital Collections Implementation Team was tasked with digitizing a subset of lantern slides from this collection.  What is a lantern slide you might ask?

RL_10074_LS_0105_large
Herding Ducks

A lantern slide is a photographic transparency which is glass-mounted and often hand-colored for projection by a “magic lantern.”  The magic lantern was the earliest form of slide projector which, in its earliest incarnation, used candles to project painted slides onto a wall or cloth screen.   The projectionist was often hidden from the audience making it seem more magical.   By the time the 1840s rolled around photographic processes had been developed by William and Frederick Langenheim that enabled a glass plate negative to be printed onto another glass plate by a contact method creating a positive.  These positives were then painted in the same fashion that the earlier slides were painted (think Kodachrome).  The magic lantern predates the school slate and the chalkboard for use in a classroom.

After working with and enjoying the digitization of the nitrate negatives from the Sidney D. Gamble Photographs it has been icing on the cake to work with the lantern slides from the same collection so many years later.  While the original black and white images resonate with me the lantern slides have added a whole new dimension to the experience.  On one hand the black and white images lend a sense of history and times passed and on the other, the vivid colors of the lantern slides draw me into the scene as if it were the present.

RL_10074_LS_0297_large
Barbers on Bund

I am in awe of the amount of work and the variety of skill sets required to create a collection such as this.   Sidney D. Gamble, an amateur photographer, to trek across China over 4 trips spanning 24 years, photographing and processing nitrate negatives in the field without a traditional darkroom, all the while taking notes and labeling the negatives.  Then to come home and create the glass plate positives and hand color over 500 of them.  For being an “amateur photographer” Gamble’s images are striking.  The type of camera he used takes skill and knowledge to create a reasonably correct exposure.  Processing the film is technically challenging in a traditional darkroom and is made much more difficult in the field.  Taking enough notes while shooting, processing and traveling so they make sense as a collection is a feat in itself.  The transfer from negative film to positive glass plates on such a scale is a tedious and technical venture.  Then to hand paint all of the slides takes additional skill and tools.  All of this makes digitization of the material look like child’s play.

An inventory of the hand-colored slides was created before digitization began.  Any hand-colored slides with existing black and white negatives were identified so they can be displayed together online.  A color-balanced light box was used to illuminate the lantern slides and a Phase One P65 Reprographic camera was used in conjunction with a precision Kaiser copy stand to capture them.   All of the equipment used in the Digital Production Center is color-calibrated and profiled so consistent results can be achieved from capture to capture.  This removes the majority of the subjective decision making from the digitization process.  Sidney D. Gamble had many variables to contend with to produce the lantern slides much like the Digital Collections Implementation Team deals with many variables when publishing a digital collection.  From conservation of the physical material, digitization, metadata, interface design to the technology used to deliver the images online and the servers and network that connect everything to make it happen, there are plenty of variables.  They are just different variables.

Nowadays we photograph and share the minutia of our lives.  When Sidney Gamble took his photographs he had to be much more deliberate.   I appreciate his deliberateness as much as I appreciate all the people involved in publishing collections.  I look forward to publication of the Sidney D. Gamble lantern slides in the near future and hope you will enjoy this collection as much as I have over the years.

Post Contributed by Mike Adamo

A Day in the Life of Digital Collections

I joined the digital collections team in early December 2013, and from day 1 I have been immersed in the details of our long list of unique projects, all with their own set of schedules, stakeholders, and resource needs.  My task has also been to evaluate and improve our overall workflow, create outreach and promotional opportunities (like this blog!), and really anything else that comes up that is related to digital projects. What does that all mean in terms of day-to-day work? It means I attend A LOT of meetings.

Haitian Declaration of Independence
Just another day in the Digital Production Center imaging the Haitian Declaration of Independence!

Luckily most of my meetings are absolutely fascinating and revolve around very exciting projects and materials.  Here are some of my favorite meetings from the last few weeks.  Truth be told, I didn’t go to all of these in one day, but they are a pretty representative sample of the types of meetings I do attend everyday.

Haitian Declaration of Independence:  Perhaps you have heard that the Rubenstein library has a copy of this historic document?  The digital collections implementation team recently met with RL curator Will Hansen to discuss digitizing and providing access to the declaration, and of course he brought it with him.  Its not that large to be honest, but very impressive.  In DPPS we are using this project as catalyst to implement an image server and a new document viewing tool to provide better access to documents like the declaration.

 

“Girl Lost in Thought at Fast Food Counter” Image from the William Gedney Digital Collection

Workflows, Workflows, workflows:  Every week I attend operational meetings with both the Duke Digital Collections Implementation teams and the Digital Production Center to discuss work in progress, scheduling, new projects, and how to perfect our ever changing workflows.  I presented, along with my colleagues from Digital Projects and Production Services as part of our monthly ITS meeting, First Wednesday, on our overall process and some of the changes we have been making since I came on board.  Check out all of our slides! 

Gedney:  Duke Digital Collections patrons are no strangers to the William Gedney Photographs and Writings digital collection.  The physical collection is being re-processed and we will be digitizing more of it later in 2014.  This is a large project with a long timeline, but we are so excited to provide access to more materials in one of our most popular digital collections.

 

Early Greek MS:  the Rubenstein Library has a large collection of early Greek manuscripts.  Many items have already been digitized, and Rubenstein Technical Services is in the process of cataloging them.     Once cataloging is complete, we will be able to plan the publishing aspects of this project.  Both DPPS and our colleagues in the Collaboratory for Classics Computing are thrilled to provide access to digital versions of these items.

Stay tuned for continuing developments in these and all the other projects we have in progress!

GreekMS
A scanned image from one of the Greek Manuscripts in the Rubenstein collection.

 

Post authored by Molly Bragg

Spring Break Travel Tips from Digital Collections

Leave Winter Behind

Today marks the beginning of Spring Break 2014 for Duke students!  We recognize that Spring Break is normally a time of quiet reflection, but for those interested in getting away this week, we’d like to offer some travel tips courtesy of our historic advertising collections.  There’s still time to plan your trip!  Let’s get started.

Dude Ranch Vacations

Where to Go

Sure, the beach is always popular with spring breakers, but consider some alternatives.  Did you know that now is the time to plan Dude Ranch Vacations?

How to Get There

With so many transportation options available it’s hard to choose.  Take in the scenery at a slower pace aboard the Vista Dome cars on the California Zephyr train, “the most talked about train in the country,” or go by Greyhound Bus to “meet the real America.

If efficiency is more your thing, travel by air to get to your destination a little faster, because, as American Airlines reminds us, “air is everywhere.”  Still not convinced?  Take United Airline’s advice: “All the Important People Fly nowadays.

Compared to buses and trains, modern air travel offers such an abundance of options and amenities. For an authentic Spring Break experience, you could reserve a seat on Resort Airline’s “Flying Houseparty” to the Caribbean or maybe grab a beverage in Continental Airline’s Coach Pub in the Sky as featured in the commercial below.

If you’re looking for something a bit more refined,  be sure to book a flight on United where master chefs demonstrate their “cosmopolitan artistry in the finest meals aloft” and where your flight attendant is guaranteed to meet United’s strict qualifications for employment (gender, age, height, weight, and marital status).

What to Take

vacation hair Whether you travel by air, train, or bus, you’ll want to pack only the essentials for your Spring Break getaway.  Start with Dr. West’s Travel Kit, which includes toothpaste and a mini-toothbrush in a “handsome sanitary glass container,” all for just 50 cents.  Be sure to include a bottle of Kreml Shampoo as well so you don’t get caught with embarrassing vacation hair.

Just because you’re traveling doesn’t mean you need to leave your entertainment at home. “Lead the Vacation Fun Parade” by packing super-tiny, ultra-compact Zenith portable radios (only 5 1/2 pounds!).

Finally, if you’re overwhelmed by too many travel options and would rather stay home, avoid the crowds, and spend your money elsewhere this Spring Break, treat yourself to something special:  It’s Spring, Get a Pontiac.

Post contributed by Noah Huffman

Notes from the Duke University Libraries Digital Projects Team