Currently viewing the category: "Open Access and Institutional Repositories"

One of Will Rogers’ best known aphorism is “I only know what I read in the papers.”  In line with Rogers’ irony, if all one knows about the Aaron Swartz case is what one reads in the blogosphere, one knows very little indeed, and much of it wrong.

Swartz has been indicted on several [...]

Continue Reading

What a mess!

On July 7, 2011 By

Recently my intern Dave Hansen (another lawyer) and I have been looking at the new author self-archiving policies promulgated by the American Chemical Society and Elsevier.  It would be more accurate to say that these policies are anti-archiving; in spite of persistent rhetoric about how committed these publishers are to access to scholarship, the clear [...]

Continue Reading

COPE, Renewed

On June 30, 2011 By

Duke University announced its COPE fund in October of 2010.  COPE, which abbreviates the Compact for Open Access Publishing Equity, is a movement for colleges and universities, mostly through their libraries, to provide financial support, usually reimbursement, for the article processing fees that some open access journals charge.  The basic idea is to see to [...]

Continue Reading

On our recent trip to Turkey, I happened to be wearing a SPARC open access t-shirt on the day we visited the site of ancient Troy, and my wife took a picture of me holding a model of the Trojan horse with the t-shirt.  How one views the Trojan horse, of course, is a [...]

Continue Reading

Patent reform has been percolating in Congress for quite a few years now, and I have to admit to being caught off-guard when I saw the announcement that a comprehensive reform package had passed in the U.S. Senate by an overwhelming majority.  This story about the bill (which has not been passed in [...]

Continue Reading

I can’t ignore termination any longer!  This is a copyright subject that has significant implications for academic authors, so it needs to be discussed in this space.  But until this week I have not been sure what to say or how to say it.  Fortunately I can now point readers to some entertaining explanations of [...]

Continue Reading

As an added benefit from the close proximity of the Science Online 2011 conference, we were fortunate, in the Duke Libraries, to have a chance earlier this month to meet and talk with Heather Piwowar.  Heather is a post-doc researcher working for the team developing Dryad, a data repository sponsored by the [...]

Continue Reading

Late last month an editorial appeared on a blog for publisher Wiley in which two editorial executives start off talking about online publishing.  The discussion is fine, if predictable and self-serving, until it turns to models of open access.  “Gold” open access is mistakenly identified exclusively with “author-pays” models, even though the majority of [...]

Continue Reading

During both the Berlin 8 conference and the Open Access Week events at Duke, the word “sustainability” was everywhere.  At the conference in Beijing, for example, the question was posed to some publisher representatives about what they needed to support OA.  Their answer was a sustainable income, not surprisingly.  Similarly, at a panel discussion on [...]

Continue Reading

Staying out of boxes

On November 7, 2010 By

One of the observations that gradually dawned on me as I listened to the presentations made at the Berlin 8 Conference on Open Access was that there was a clear difference between those countries, like the US, where scientific publishing is dominated by commercial publishers and those where the majority of the publishing is still [...]

Continue Reading