Since it was announced that I will move shortly to the University of Kansas, several people have asked me if I intend to continue blogging, and have kindly encouraged me to do so. This blog, of course, will remain one of the communication outlets for the Scholarly Communications program at Duke, and my Duke colleagues Paolo Mangiafico and Haley Walton, as well as others, will fill the space, I am sure, with interesting and worthwhile reads.
I do intend to keep blogging, however, at a different site and in a different format. Over the past few weeks, some colleagues and I have assembled a great group of people interested in scholarship, publishing and libraries, and I am excited to announce a new, collective blog called IO: In the Open.
On this new site, this group of people will be writing about how scholarship and scholarly publishing is changing and can change in ways that better adapt to new technologies, needs, and economics:
Institutional Repository Manager, University of Chicago Library
Director, Copyright & Digital Scholarship, North Carolina State University Libraries
Head, Scholarly Communications & Collection Strategy, MIT Libraries
Digital Content Strategist, Penn State University Library
Director, Scholarly Communications Office, Emory University Library
Director, University of North Carolina Press
Associate Dean for Digital Strategies, University of Miami Libraries
Dean of Libraries, University of Kansas
Associate University Librarian for Research & Learning, University of Minnesota
Vice Dean, University of Arizona Libraries
The title of this new blog should not surprise folks. It is born out of the conviction that scholarship should be open because…
Scholarship in the open is better business – it provides a clearer perspective on what it actually costs to produce articles, books and other scholarly output.
Scholarship in the open is better for libraries – it connects us more directly with our researchers and with the life entire life cycle of research. It improves our ability to disseminate the outcomes of research and get the materials they need into the hands of students, teachers and others quickly and efficiently.
Scholarship in the open pushes us towards better copyright laws — it encourages us to think about how copyright could better align with author incentives and reminds us that, because the reasons creators create are so various, the law needs more flexibility than it currently has.
Scholarship in the open is better scholarship – it can be read and evaluated by a much larger and more varied audience. It takes the initial process of evaluating works of scholarship out of the hands of a small elite, some of whom are ill-prepared for the task, and offers the potential for more diverse ways of measuring impact and providing more complete information for the hiring, tenure and promotion process.
Our first blog post at IO: In the Open, by Ellen Finnie of MIT, will focus on the vital issue of how we spend our money in libraries, and how we can think in broader terms about the value of scholarly resources. Ellen’s post, with its interesting analogy to food-supply chains, will be published on IO within the next day or so.
I hope that the people who have followed Scholarly Communications @ Duke so faithfully over the years will also subscribe to IO: In the Open. We believe you will find a interesting, committed and diverse set of voices there that will help shape the discussion of these issues in years to come.
If you follow this blog on Twitter (Twitter handle @klsmith4906), that account will also tweet out new post from IO: In the Open. Or, you can follow our new IO Twitter account: https://twitter.com/IOIntheOpen. You can also subscribe directly to the IO: In the Open blog posts by using the widget on the side of the IO page.