Funding and Author Support for Open Access
By Adonna Thompson, Assistant Director of Duke Medical Center Library for Archival Collections and Services
In a previous post we discussed the different models for open access, which provided examples of the partnerships and relationships between authors and publishers. It also touched on funding models. In this post I hope to give the reader with a more in-depth understanding of funding issues by providing links to relevant articles, websites, and additional resources.
Funding is a major issue when it comes to publishing within, and sustaining an open access model. Open access journals don’t charge subscription or access fees to users, but publishing does cost money. So, who should pay? The Compact for Open-Access Publishing Equity or COPE provides insight and a possible solution to this issue:
Josh Hadro states the problem succinctly in his Library Journal article, “Five Universities Sign Open Access Funding Compact.”
“It’s hard to bootstrap a new industry model into existence, even in the best of times. And no matter how compelling its conceptual underpinnings may be, open access publishing is subject to the same economic realities as any other kind of publishing.“
So far, it appears that the most viable and sustainable model for funding open access publishing is through institutional support. The challenge has been, and will continue to be, getting buy-in from our institutions. Though, several major research institutions and organizations have signed the compact for open-access publishing equity and this is a large step in helping to create a sustainable business model for open access.
Articles and Resources:
ARL: Reshaping Scholarly Communication
Funding Scientific Open Access
PLoS Biology – Essay: Funding the Way to Open Access
Society for Scholarly Publishing – the scholarly kitchen blog:
Why the Open Access Financial Model Will Continue to Transmogrify
PLoS Biology – Perspective Article: Institutional Open Access Funds: Now Is the Time
BioMed Central’s major funders of biomedical research
2 Responses to Funding and Author Support for Open Access
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Policy on Electronic Course Content
For help deciding whether course content in Blackboard or some other digital form is fair use or requires copyright permission, consult this policy document adopted by the Academic Council in February 2008.
Search the Scholarly Communications Blog
Categories
- Authors' Rights
- Copyright in the Classroom
- Copyright Information Notes
- Copyright Issues and Legislation
- Data
- Digital Rights Management
- Fair Use
- international IP
- Libraries
- Licensing
- Open Access and Institutional Repositories
- Open Access topics
- Orphan works
- Public Domain
- Scholarly Publishing
- Technologies
- Traditional Knowledge
- Uncategorized
- User Generated Content
Archives
Recent Comments
- Academic publisher on Finding out who your friends are
- Martina Periodicos on The GSU decision — not an easy road for anyone
- Jeff Malaguilla on The six million dollar fair use standard
- Kevin Smith on “the radical disaggregation of scholarship” | Marygrove Library News on Meet me at the intersection
- friends and foes at Attempting Elegance on Finding out who your friends are


As Duke University’s first Scholarly Communications Officer, Kevin Smith’s principal role is to teach and advise faculty, administrators and students about copyright, intellectual property licensing and scholarly publishing.
RSS Feed

Coping With Scarcity: Mandate Green OA Before Subsidizing Gold OA
[...] open access, e.g., through blogs/newsletters: SPARC Open Access Newsletter, OPENBIOMED.Info, Scholarly Communications @ Duke, University of California’s Reshaping Scholarly [...]