Our next OA Week posting comes from Michael Peper, Librarian for Math and Physics at Duke:
We’ve discussed openness in terms of publications and data, but this same spirit can apply to the research process as well. Science in some ways is necessarily a shared and collaborative process. Scientists work together in labs, they share equipment, materials and human resources and share results in publications. In many cases, however, there was much about the practice of science that has been kept in the dark. Scientists would not share methods, data, preliminary results, etc. until publication, if ever. Recently, however, there has been great interest in trying to answer big questions and solve big problems by joining forces to accomplish work that could never be done by one isolated researcher. Improved cyber infrastructure makes the opportunities for sharing even greater. Many believe that Open Science should not just be adopted for its admirable ideals, but also because open science also holds promise of being better science.
The title of this post, however, is ‘What is Open Science?’ so perhaps I should actually attempt to answer that question.
The boundaries of Open Science are difficult to define because this idea encompasses other issues related to openness. Transparency, across the entire practice of science, is what defines Open Science. Both Science Commons and the Open Science Project lay out their principles of this idea in an attempt to provide it some limits. The spirit of these principles is that there should be transparency to the methods, observations, data collection, data access, communication, collaboration and research tools. Instead of limiting the sharing of the practice of science to publication of selected results, the entire scientific process should be exposed to potential users, collaborators and extenders of the work.
There are a growing number of projects that have embraced these ideals and we can point to a few of them here. Cameron Neylon keeps an open notebook for his work in the biological sciences on producing antibacterial compounds and also writes for the blog Science in the Open. The Synaptic Leap is another open lab notebook project to create a way for biomedical researchers to collaborate. The collaborators include Thomas Kepler at the Duke University Medical Center. A final example is the UsefulChem project which is the brainchild of Jean-Claude Bradley who uses his background as an organic chemist to develop new anti-malarial compounds in an open environment.
Policy on Electronic Course Content
For help deciding whether course content in Blackboard or some other digital form is fair use or requires copyright permission, consult this policy document adopted by the Academic Council in February 2008.
Search the Scholarly Communications Blog
- Authors' Rights
- Copyright in the Classroom
- Copyright Information Notes
- Copyright Issues and Legislation
- Digital Rights Management
- Fair Use
- international IP
- Open Access and Institutional Repositories
- Open Access topics
- Orphan works
- Public Domain
- Scholarly Publishing
- Traditional Knowledge
- User Generated Content
- Feeding the Goose: Thoughts on Fair Use and the GSU Decision | The Scholarly Kitchen on GSU appeal ruling — the more I read, the better it seems
- Appellate Court Reverses District Court Judgment in Publishers v. Georgia State U. Fair Use Case | LJ INFOdocket on A reversal for Georgia State
- Jen Holton on Are fair use and open access incompatible?
- Karen Jensen on Jury instructions go missing
- Dave Hansen on Jury instructions go missing