Use case on NIH Public Access
Another question that is becoming common is about how to comply with the National Institute of Health Public Access Policy. The answer presented here was to an inquiry about an article accepted for publication in the journal “Nature,” whose policy about compliance is fairly well-publicized and easy to find. The specific steps that an author must taken to be sure they have the rights necessary to authorized deposit (or to be sure the journal will deposit for them) will vary with each publisher; where there is uncertainty about the policy or negotiations required, the answer will be much longer that this one.
Dear Professor _____________,
Congratulations on the paper! The first step in complying with the NIH public access policy is to be sure you retained the right to deposit the article when you signed a publication agreement. If you signed Nature’s usual author’s license, a copy of which is available here — http://www.nature.com/nature/authors/submissions/final/authorlicense .pdf — there will not be any problem. That license allows the author(s) to retain copyright, although it gives Nature an exclusive right to publish, and it specifies that the author can place the article in a funder’s open access database subject to a six-month embargo.
Assuming that this is the license you signed, your next step is to actually deposit the article in PubMed Central. You do this using the NIHMS system; there are instructions and links here — http://publicaccess.nih.gov/submit_process.htm . We are being told by those who have used it that the submission process is fairly easy and straightforward. Nevertheless, if you have any difficulties, just let me know and I or one of the librarians will be glad to come to your office and help you with it.
Once you have submitted the article, along with any supplemental material, all you have to do is wait. NIH will send you, or the principle investigator named on the appropriate grant if that is someone other than you, a final copy of the article as it will appear in PubMed Central for verification. It is important to review the article at that time to be sure everything is correct, just as you would do with the page proofs for the journal, and respond to that e-mail.
At some point in the process you will be asked to verify that you have the right to authorize PMC availability and to tell PMC about any embargo. As I said, if you signed the usual Nature license you do have the right to authorize availability and you should indicate a six month embargo. Even though you should submit your article immediately, it will not appear in the PMC database until six months after publication in Nature, in accordance with your license obligation.
For future reference in any paperwork submitted to the NIH, you will need to obtain the PMC ID number for your article. This helps NIH track compliance with the policy and is now required on renewal applications, progress reports and the like. Again, library staff can help you find this number if you have any difficulty.
2 Responses to Use case on NIH Public Access
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Policy on Electronic Course Content
For help deciding whether course content in Blackboard or some other digital form is fair use or requires copyright permission, consult this policy document adopted by the Academic Council in February 2008.
Search the Scholarly Communications Blog
Categories
- Authors' Rights
- Copyright in the Classroom
- Copyright Information Notes
- Copyright Issues and Legislation
- Data
- Digital Rights Management
- Fair Use
- international IP
- Libraries
- Licensing
- Open Access and Institutional Repositories
- Open Access topics
- Orphan works
- Public Domain
- Scholarly Publishing
- Technologies
- Traditional Knowledge
- Uncategorized
- User Generated Content
Archives
Recent Comments
- Dan Suvak on The GSU decision — not an easy road for anyone
- Kristina on The GSU decision — not an easy road for anyone
- ATG Hot Topic of the Week: The Georgia State Lawsuit (plus, Unglue.it) | Against-the-Grain.com on The GSU decision — not an easy road for anyone
- Weekly Link Roundup | Lone Star Librarian on The GSU decision — not an easy road for anyone
- Evolutions in Scholarship – Decision in the Georgia State U. copyright lawsuit on The GSU decision — not an easy road for anyone
Recommended Readings- A State Law Approach to Preserving Fair Use in Academic Libraries"By David R. Hansen" Posted by klsmith to myblog contracts copyright on Thu Sep 15 2011 […]
- Canada's Orphan Works Regime: Unlocatable Copyright Owners and the Copyright Board"Article by Jeremy De Beers and Mario Bouchard form the Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, Winter 2010" Posted by klsmith to myblog "orphan works" Canada copyright on Thu Sep 15 2011 […]
- Print or Perish: Authors' attitudes towards electronic-only publication of law journals"Duke Law Librarian Dick Danner and colleagues report on a study about how authors feel if their articles (in law journals) were no longer available on paper" Posted by klsmith to digital publication myblog on Mon Aug 08 2011 […]
- Copyright in the Age of YouTube | ABA Journal - Law News Now"Details how DMCA is rapidly become out-of-date as digital technology changes." Posted by klsmith to myblog digital technology copyright on Thu Jan 29 2009 […]
- A State Law Approach to Preserving Fair Use in Academic Libraries


As Duke University’s first Scholarly Communications Officer, Kevin Smith’s principal role is to teach and advise faculty, administrators and students about copyright, intellectual property licensing and scholarly publishing.
RSS Feed 







“Again, library staff can help you find this number if you have
any difficulty.” It is good to know that we are here to help. First, we have to figure out how…
good to know for my next paper. That will be helpful