Publishing recordings of student performances
Q – Students in my language class are doing performances of plays and recitals of poetry that are being recorded. May I place these recordings where students in the class can watch them repeatedly to help reinforce the learning? Can I put them on the open Web to showcase my students’ talent?
This is a fairly complicated question, since it involves four separate elements.
First there is the issue of when the material being performed was published. Anything published before 1923 is in the public domain and can be performed, recorded and distributed freely. After 1923 there is a complex set of rules (see chart here) that determine whether something is still in copyright protection. Although much material published between 1923 and 1963 has in fact passed into the public domain, for simplicity sake we will assume here that such material is still protected.
The second element to consider is the genre of the material. The TEACH Act, which makes transmission to students in the class possible, distinguishes between performances of dramatic and non-dramatic works, with the former subject to more limited use. When the TEACH Act applies, only limited portions of a dramatic performance can be transmitted, while all of the performance of a non-dramatic poem, for example, is permitted.
Next is the issue of to whom the transmission is made available. If only students registered for the class can view the recordings, the TEACH Act applies. This means that we can use material that is protected by copyright as long as the specific requirements of that law are met. When the general public is the recipient, however, there is no exception that is likely to allow transmission of a performance of a protected work, so permission would be necessary. Performances of works no longer in copyright can be transmitted freely to either group.
Finally, it is necessary to be concerned about the privacy of the students whose work is being recorded. Those students have a right to protect the privacy of their educational records, including a recording of their classroom work. Although transmission to other students in the class probably does not endanger this privacy, if performances are available to the general public it is necessary to get a signed release form from each student whose work is recorded.
This chart provides a schematic overview of the various possibilities:
|
|
Available only to students registered in the class |
Available to the general public via the Internet |
|
Poetry published in 1923 or later. |
OK, based on TEACH Act rules re. non-dramatic performances |
Only with © permission and a written waiver from the student(s) involved. |
|
Poetry published before 1923. |
OK (public domain) |
OK with a written release from the student(s) involved. |
|
Drama written in 1923 or later. |
Limited portions only, based on TEACH Act rules re. dramatic performances |
Only with © permission and a written waiver from the students involved. |
|
Drama written before 1923. |
OK (public domain) |
OK with a written release from the students involved. |
The general message to be gleaned from this analysis is that it is quite possible to use recordings of student performances, even on the open Web, provided that material is carefully selected and the students and the uses are planned for in advance.
2 Responses to Publishing recordings of student performances
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Policy on Electronic Course Content
For help deciding whether course content in Blackboard or some other digital form is fair use or requires copyright permission, consult this policy document adopted by the Academic Council in February 2008.
Search the Scholarly Communications Blog
Categories
- Authors' Rights
- Copyright in the Classroom
- Copyright Information Notes
- Copyright Issues and Legislation
- Data
- Digital Rights Management
- Fair Use
- international IP
- Libraries
- Licensing
- Open Access and Institutional Repositories
- Open Access topics
- Orphan works
- Public Domain
- Scholarly Publishing
- Technologies
- Traditional Knowledge
- Uncategorized
- User Generated Content
Archives
Recent Comments
- Dan Suvak on The GSU decision — not an easy road for anyone
- Kristina on The GSU decision — not an easy road for anyone
- ATG Hot Topic of the Week: The Georgia State Lawsuit (plus, Unglue.it) | Against-the-Grain.com on The GSU decision — not an easy road for anyone
- Weekly Link Roundup | Lone Star Librarian on The GSU decision — not an easy road for anyone
- Evolutions in Scholarship – Decision in the Georgia State U. copyright lawsuit on The GSU decision — not an easy road for anyone
Recommended Readings- A State Law Approach to Preserving Fair Use in Academic Libraries"By David R. Hansen" Posted by klsmith to myblog contracts copyright on Thu Sep 15 2011 […]
- Canada's Orphan Works Regime: Unlocatable Copyright Owners and the Copyright Board"Article by Jeremy De Beers and Mario Bouchard form the Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, Winter 2010" Posted by klsmith to myblog "orphan works" Canada copyright on Thu Sep 15 2011 […]
- Print or Perish: Authors' attitudes towards electronic-only publication of law journals"Duke Law Librarian Dick Danner and colleagues report on a study about how authors feel if their articles (in law journals) were no longer available on paper" Posted by klsmith to digital publication myblog on Mon Aug 08 2011 […]
- Copyright in the Age of YouTube | ABA Journal - Law News Now"Details how DMCA is rapidly become out-of-date as digital technology changes." Posted by klsmith to myblog digital technology copyright on Thu Jan 29 2009 […]
- A State Law Approach to Preserving Fair Use in Academic Libraries


As Duke University’s first Scholarly Communications Officer, Kevin Smith’s principal role is to teach and advise faculty, administrators and students about copyright, intellectual property licensing and scholarly publishing.
RSS Feed 







How do you distinguish between a dramatic and a non-dramatic reading of a poem?
This is an excellent, and difficult, question. The Copyright Act does not define the two terms, but several authoratative interpretations suggest that a dramatic work is one which is “invented” and “set in order” in such a way that the story is related by dialogue and action rather than merely being narrated. The key seems to be that a dramatic work tells a story that is presented as actually happening in front of the audiance. So reading Frost’s “The Road Not Taken,” which refers to events that occurred “ages and ages” ago, would not be a dramatic performance, while reading a poem that is all, or mostly, dialogue, may well be.